郴州卷烟厂:ScienceDirect - Journal of the American Colle...
- Hub
- ScienceDirect
- Scopus
- SciTopics
- Applications
- Register
- Login
- Go to SciVal Suite
Drug Discovery Today
Drug Discovery Today, Volume 7, Issue 11, 6 May 2002, Pages 588-590
Matt Brown
International Congress Series
International Congress Series, Volume 1262, May 2004, Pages 83-86
Shu-Ling Liang, Mei-Zhen Cui, Marc S. Penn, Guy M. Chisolm
Abstract
Cell surface tissue factor (TF), which can initiate local coagulation, is upregulated in cells within atherosclerotic plaques, including macrophages, endothelial cells (EC) and smooth muscle cells (SMC). TF binds coagulation factors VIIa and Xa to make a catalytically active complex that produces thrombin and ultimately fibrin, leading to inflammation and coagulation. Using rat SMC, we have shown that lipids of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and oxidized LDL (oxLDL) differentially regulate TF gene expression and TF activity. Unknown lipids of LDL induced the gene, but did not enhance activity. In contrast, oxLDL or its extracted lipids induced both the TF gene and TF activity. Specific lipids of oxLDL, e.g., lipid hydroperoxides, and H2O2 increased TF activity without enhancing TF gene or protein. The effects of lipid hydroperoxides were antioxidant-inhibitable. Lysophosphatidic acid (lysoPA) and lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC), important lipid mediators of many cellular processes and formed during LDL oxidation, increased TF mRNA, protein and activity. LysoPA induced the TF gene via a Gi-protein-coupled signaling process. Thus, different lipoprotein-borne lipids in atherosclerotic lesions enhance TF gene expression and TF activity through distinct mechanisms. These effects may contribute to lesion development and subsequent complications.
Advances in Pharmacology
Advances in Pharmacology, Volume 37, 1996, Pages 299-318
Mark C. Kowala
Click here for a PDF excerpt
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Volume 31, Issue 4, April 2006, Pages 386-393
E.A. Kaperonis, C.D. Liapis, J.D. Kakisis, D. Dimitroulis, V.G. Papavassiliou
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this article is to discuss the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis.Summary
An initial chemical, mechanical or immunological insult induces endothelial dysfunction. This triggers a cascade of inflammatory reactions, in which monocytes, macrophages, T lymphocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells participate. Leukocyte adhesion molecules, cytokines, growth factors and metalloproteinases participate in all stages of atherogenesis. Almost all of the traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis are associated with and participate in the inflammatory process. Many infectious agents, mainly Chlamydia pneumoniae, have been proposed as potential triggers of the cascade. The immune system has been implicated in plaque formation, through the activation of cellular and humoral immunity against innate or microbial heat shock protein 60. Methods of detection of systemic or local plaque inflammation have been developed and research is being conducted on the potential use of anti-inflammatory and antibiotic drugs in atherosclerosis.
The American Journal of Medicine
The American Journal of Medicine, Volume 91, Issue 1, Supplement 2, 31 July 1991, Pages S3-S9
Robert W. Wissler
Abstract
The major components of atherosclerotic plaque, ultimately responsible for clinical effects, are deposited lipids—mostly cholesteryl esters and cholesterol, derived largely from the lower-density lipoproteins of the blood—and proliferated, modified arterial smooth muscle cells with their synthesized connective tissue products. Advanced plaques vary widely in the proportion of the two components, but evidence indicates that lipid deposition—especially of lipoprotein elements—often occurs in the lesion-prone intimal areas of the artery prior to the buildup of smooth muscle cells. The 1980s were remarkably productive for investigators who study the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. We now know of the many forms of lower-density lipoproteins, i.e., low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), some of which are more likely to be associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and some of which are more likely to be influenced by diet. Among these forms of LDL and VLDL are LDL-1, β-VLDL, and Lp(a). Work has been reported implicating various alterations of endothelial function in the permeability of the arterial endothelial barrier in the transport of these low-density, cholesterol-rich macromolecules. Of possibly greater interest is the developing evidence that such proliferation-stimulating molecules as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) can be produced by a number of cells likely to be involved in the progression of atherosclerotic plaque. In addition to platelets, these include activated monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages, injured endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells, which can undergo an autocrine conversion to PDGF synthesis—possibly stimulated by LDL from hyperlipidemic serum. Leukotrienes and other endothelium-associated regulatory molecules may also take part in the paracrine and autocrine mechanisms of stimulating smooth-muscle-cell proliferation. Additional recent developments that have led to a better understanding of atherosclerotic pathogenesis have occurred. The first is evidence of the involvement of oxidized LDL and its apolipoprotein B in atherogenesis. Research indicates that antioxidants have a suppressive effect on atherogenesis when oxidized LDL has been involved in lesion development. The data linking the development of autoimmune reactions to these oxidatively altered lipoproteins are also impressive. Further, there is increasing evidence that atherogenesis in nonhuman primates and in people in whom chronic sustained circulating immune complexes are involved is likely to be accelerated, even when few or no classic risk factors are present. These lesions appear to represent a distinct microarchitectural form of concentric and transmural atherosclerosis that is better classified as “atheroarteritis.”
Toxicology Letters
Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, Volume 22, Issue 4, June 2011, Pages 349-350
View Record in Scopus
Provided by Scopus
Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases
Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases, 2004, Pages 288-294
Jesus A. Araujo, Aldons J. Lusis
Click here for a PDF excerpt
Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition
Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 2003, Page i
Encyclopedia of Toxicology
Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 2005, Pages 467-485
Arthur Penn, Gleeson Murphy
Click here for a PDF excerpt
Encyclopedia of Stress
Encyclopedia of Stress, 2007, Pages 530-535
G.Z. Feuerstein, R.R. Ruffolo, C. Coughlin, J. Wang, D. Miller
Abstract
Inflammation plays a key role in acute injuries as well as chronic diseases. The immune and inflammatory reactions serve as the major defense mechanism against numerous external injurious events as well as pathological events that emerge as a result of endogenous aberrant genetic and biochemical imbalances. However, immune and inflammatory reactions can also evolve as a cause of diseases such as autoimmune and granulomatous conditions; cancer; respiratory, joint, and bone diseases; and atherosclerosis. Thus, anti-inflammatory drugs emerge as an important source of novel therapeutics for diverse diseases such as cancer, metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis, joint and bone diseases, and respiratory tract disorders.
Comprehensive Toxicology
Comprehensive Toxicology, 2010, Chapter 6.24, Pages 447-463
A. Barchowsky
Abstract
Metals are among the oldest toxicants known to humans. Their impact on human health in general is well documented. However, their role in promoting cardiovascular diseases and their mechanisms for affects in heart and vascular tissues are often unrealized or controversial. The approach of using high dose toxicity studies that determine lethal dosages or acute toxicities in animals often confuses understanding of disease etiologies in humans, especially in understanding mechanisms of chronic disease promotion. There is increased appreciation that environmental exposures to metals or exposures even at occupational or therapeutic levels may have more subtle effects in causing or modifying chronic diseases. Exposures to metals are widespread and may produce greater effects in susceptible populations or when exposures occur during development. Mechanisms of metals or metalloid action are often thought to be mediated by nonspecific interactions with peptide or protein sulfhydryls, produced by random oxidant injury, or caused by disrupting the normal signaling of selective ion channels. While possibly true at the highest levels of exposure, recent epidemiological studies and studies in genetic rodent models indicate that pathogenic effects of metals on cell signaling are not random and cannot be accounted for by direct competition with endogenous ions or excessive oxidant-mediated injury. Resolution of the molecular understanding of these pathogenic effects and toxicities remains a challenge. This challenge is complicated by complex differential concentration- and time-dependent relationships for metal effects in different cell types, as well as a high degree of interactions between metals in common mixed exposures. This chapter will present pathogenic effects of metals in the heart and blood vessels with an emphasis on the cellular and molecular actions underlying disease or clinically significant toxicities that are directly linked to human exposures to metals. Essential endogenous metals, such as calcium, magnesium, and potassium that are critical for normal electrical conductance and cardiovascular function, will be discussed only indirectly.
- PDF (1847 K)
- Export citation
- E-mail article
Volume 54, Issue 23, 1 December 2009, Pages 2129-2138
State-of-the-Art Paper
Inflammation in Atherosclerosis: From Pathophysiology to PracticePeter Libby MD
† Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
‡ Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Until recently, most envisaged atherosclerosis as a bland arterial collection of cholesterol, complicated by smooth muscle cell accumulation. According to that concept, endothelial denuding injury led to platelet aggregation and release of platelet factors which would trigger the proliferation of smooth muscle cells in the arterial intima. These cells would then elaborate an extracellular matrix that would entrap lipoproteins, forming the nidus of the atherosclerotic plaque. Beyond the vascular smooth muscle cells long recognized in atherosclerotic lesions, subsequent investigations identified immune cells and mediators at work in atheromata, implicating inflammation in this disease. Multiple independent pathways of evidence now pinpoint inflammation as a key regulatory process that links multiple risk factors for atherosclerosis and its complications with altered arterial biology. Knowledge has burgeoned regarding the operation of both innate and adaptive arms of immunity in atherogenesis, their interplay, and the balance of stimulatory and inhibitory pathways that regulate their participation in atheroma formation and complication. This revolution in our thinking about the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis has now begun to provide clinical insight and practical tools that may aid patient management. This review provides an update of the role of inflammation in atherogenesis and highlights how translation of these advances in basic science promises to change clinical practice.
Key Words: atherosclerosis; inflammation; heart disease
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; GWAS, genome-wide association screen; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NNT, number needed to treat; TLR, Toll-like receptor; Treg, regulatory T cell
Article Outline
- Innate and Adaptive Immunity: Twin Arms of the Immune Response Involved in Atherosclerosis
- Innate immunity in atherosclerosis
- Adaptive immunity in atherosclerosis
- Humoral immunity in atherosclerosis
- Adaptive immunity in atherosclerosis
- Clinical Translation of Inflammation Biology: The Role of Biomarkers
- Biomarkers of inflammation in risk prediction
- hsCRP as a potential therapeutic goal
- Targeting therapy using hsCRP
- hsCRP as a potential therapeutic goal
- The Future of Inflammation in Atherosclerosis
- Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: beyond statins
- Imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis
- Genetics of inflammation in atherosclerosis
- Imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis
- Conclusions
- References
Just 3 decades ago the prevailing viewpoint envisaged atherosclerosis as a bland proliferative process (1). According to that concept, endothelial denuding injury led to platelet aggregation and release of platelet-derived growth factor that would trigger the proliferation of smooth muscle cells in the arterial intima, and form the nidus of the atherosclerotic plaque. This cellular model of atherosclerosis updated Virchow's concepts of atherosclerosis as a response to injury formulated in the mid-19th century. The advent of the cell biological era of atherosclerosis supplanted the simplistic concept of the atheroma as a passive deposition of lipid debris on the artery wall. Beyond the vascular smooth muscle cells long recognized in atherosclerotic lesions, subsequent work identified immune cells and mediators at work in atheromata, implicating inflammatory mechanisms in disease development (2). The advent of gene-targeting technology enabled the testing of the roles of specific molecules in the development of experimental atherosclerosis in mice. Such data demonstrated a critical role for hypercholesterolemia and also supported the participation of immune mechanisms in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (3).
Multiple independent pathways of evidence now pinpoint inflammation as a key regulatory process that links multiple risk factors for atherosclerosis and its complications with altered arterial biology. This revolution in our thinking about the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis has begun to provide clinical insight and practical tools that may aid patient management. This review provides an update of the role of inflammation in atherogenesis and highlights how translation of these advances in basic science promises to change clinical practice.
Innate and Adaptive Immunity: Twin Arms of the Immune Response Involved in Atherosclerosis
Through evolution, the inflammatory response has grown in complexity and has provided host defenses against infection and injury. Moreover, inflammatory mechanisms also participate in the repair of injured tissues. The primitive arm of inflammation, known as innate immunity, echoes in mammals pathways extant in early eukaryotes (4). Primitive phagocytic cells, evolutionary precursors of the mammalian monocyte/macrophage (Fig. 1), exist in marine invertebrates as recognized by Metchnikoff in the 19th century (5). The innate immune response mounts rapidly and combats perceived foreign invaders, often with preformed mediators. “Natural antibodies,” certain complement proteins, and families of cell surface receptors recognize microbial products that can elicit an immediate response without requiring “education” of the immune system. The receptors involved in these primordial host defense responses include several families of macrophage scavenger receptors, also implicated in uptake of modified lipoproteins, and a family of Toll-like receptors (TLR) (Fig. 2). The TLRs, named after Drosophila genes, belong to the family of pattern-recognition receptors that recognize microbial structures and products. These receptors trigger a complex intracellular signaling cascade that stimulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines and other inflammatory mediators. The innate immune response, characterized as “fast and blunt,” recognizes a limited diversity of structures on the order of hundreds.
High-quality image (533K)
Figure 1.
Elements Involved in Innate Immunity
This figure summarizes some of the functions ascribed to various cellular participants in atherosclerosis that may participate in the disease and its complication when dysregulated. Mononuclear phagocytes represent the bulwark of the innate immune defenses in mammals. Monocytes give rise to macrophages, which in the arterial intima form foam cells, the hallmark of the arterial fatty streak. Recent work has focused on heterogeneity of mononuclear phagocytes. We now recognize a proinflammatory subset distinct from a less inflammatory population of monocytes. The inflammatory subset expresses high levels of the cell-surface marker Ly6C (also known as GR-1) in the mouse. These inflammatory monocytes express higher levels of Toll-like receptors (TLR), and the other functions indicated, including elaboration of high levels of the cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-1. The less inflammatory subset of monocytes express higher levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, the scavenger receptors CD36 and scavenger receptor A (SR-A), and angiogenic mediators including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Dendritic cells express human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules among the other indicated structures. Dendritic cells present antigens to T cells, linking innate to adaptive immunity. Mast cells elaborate many mediators as shown. Recent data support a causal role for mast cells in mouse atherosclerosis. Platelets also participate in adaptive immunity. When activated, platelets exteriorize CD40 ligand (CD40L or CD154) and release mediators including RANTES (regulated and T-cell expressed secreted), myeloid related protein (MRP)-8/14, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and TGF-beta.
View Within Article
High-quality image (289K)
Figure 2.
Cells Involved in Atherosclerosis Express Pattern-Recognition Receptors Involved in Innate Immunity
With the cooperation of CD14, Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 binds bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and a variety of other potential instigators of inflammation and atherosclerosis including heat shock proteins (hsp). TLR2 usually exists as a heterodimer with TLR1 or TLR6. TLR2 complexes can bind microbial products as shown and, in addition, apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII). Scavenger receptor A binds modified low-density lipoproteins (LDL). CD36 binds oxidatively modified LDL. The receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) also decorates many cells involved in atherosclerosis and may function in inflammatory signaling.
View Within Article
The adaptive immune response has arisen more recently in evolution (Fig. 3). This arm of host defenses, in contrast to the innate immune response, requires “education” of the immune system. Common clinical experience illustrates the lag time in developing an adaptive immune response. For example, an antibody response or a cellular immune response requires weeks to months following vaccination with an antigen. Also in contrast with the innate immune response, the adaptive arm displays exquisite specificity. Instead of recognizing mere hundreds of molecular patterns, the repertoire of antibodies and T cell receptors can recognize many millions of specific structures.
High-quality image (570K)
Figure 3.
Cells Involved in Adaptive Immunity
The text describes the functional roles of the 5 classes of lymphocytes depicted in atherosclerosis. B cells elaborate antibodies (Ab). A specialized subset of B cells (B1 cells) elaborate primarily immunoglobulin M antibodies, including natural antibodies that recognize constituents of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL). The bottom panel of this figure portrays diagrammatically the effect of the various cell types on lesions, based mostly on experiments in mice. Up arrows indicate aggravation of lesion formation. Down arrows indicate reduction in lesion formation. This diagram summarizes the “net” effect attributed to the cell type on atherosclerosis primarily on the basis of experiments in mice. In some cases, this figure necessarily oversimplifies the complexity of the data. For example, not all TH2 cell functions and not all antibodies elaborated by B cells may mitigate atherogenesis. CTL = cytolytic T lymphocytes; IFN = interferon; hsp = heat shock protein; Th = T helper cells; TReg = regulatory T cells; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.
View Within Article
The inflammatory response in atherosclerosis involves elements of both the innate and adaptive limbs of immunity.
Innate immunity in atherosclerosis
Considerable evidence supports the early involvement of the monocyte/macrophage, the most prominent cellular component of the innate immune response, during atherogenesis. Observations in human arterial specimens and many experimental models of atherosclerosis have identified monocyte recruitment as an early event in atherogenesis. The recruitment of mononuclear phagocytes involves attachment to activated endothelial cells by leukocyte adhesion molecules. Several protein mediators, specialized cytokines known as chemokines, direct cell migration of monocytes into the intima. Maturation of monocytes into macrophages, their multiplication, and production of many mediators ensues. Previous reviews recount the details of these now well-understood molecular mechanisms that we will not repeat here ([6] and [7]).
Since last reviewed, several new findings regarding monocyte recruitment to atherosclerosis have come to light. First, examination of the kinetics of monocyte recruitment to mouse atherosclerotic lesions suggests that monocyte entry occurs not just during the initial stages of lesion formation, but continues even in established lesions (8). This observation has implications for targeting monocyte recruitment for atherosclerosis treatment.
Another recent recognition revolves around monocyte heterogeneity in atherosclerosis (9). Evidence from mouse experiments and in humans suggests a disease-relevant dimorphism of monocytes ([10], [11] and [12]). Hyperlipidemia elicits a profound enrichment of a proinflammatory subset of monocytes in the mouse. These proinflammatory monocytes, recognized by high levels of a marker known as Ly6C, or Gr-1, may correspond to a human monocyte subset marked by the presence of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand (PSGL) (13). These proinflammatory monocytes home to atherosclerotic lesions, where they propagate the innate immune response by expressing high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and other macrophage mediators, including matrix metalloproteinases (Fig. 1, left).
Recent evidence has also highlighted the potential participation of mast cells in atherosclerosis. Long identified as a minority leukocyte population in the arterial adventitia and atherosclerotic intima, mast cells exhibit numerous functions implicated in atherogenesis ([14] and [15]). For example, mast cells release vasoactive small molecules such as histamine and leukotrienes, certain serine proteinases, and heparin, a cofactor in growth factor action and angiogenesis. Recent pharmacologic and genetic studies have provided firm evidence for mast cell participation in atherogenesis in mice ([16] and [17]). As established pharmacologic agents can modulate mast cell functions in humans, these recent observations also have therapeutic implications. The extension of these mouse experiments to humans requires further research.
Many links exist between lipoproteins and innate immunity. Modified lipoproteins interact with scavenger receptors (Fig. 2), and may thus send proinflammatory signals. Oxidized phospholipids derived from modified lipoproteins may also drive inflammation. A lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) currently targeted in clinical trials, may generate pro-inflammatory derivatives of oxidatively modified lipoproteins (18). Recent data show that apolipoprotein CIII, a constituent of certain triglyceride-rich lipoproteins associated with poor clinical outcomes, incites inflammation by binding to TLR2 (Fig. 2) (19).
Another area of recent advance in relation to innate immunity in atherosclerosis regards the links between thrombosis and inflammation. Previously considered independent pathways in host defense, current evidence supports considerable crosstalk (20). For example, prostaglandins produced through the cyclooxygenase pathway control inflammation as well as thrombosis. Therefore, anti-inflammatory cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors may heighten thrombotic risk. A major protein mediator of coagulation, thrombin, can elicit the expression of proinflammatory cytokines from vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Platelets, when activated, can secrete preformed proinflammatory cytokines and exteriorize and shed a multipotent proinflammatory stimulus, CD40-ligand (CD154). Platelets can also release a proinflammatory mediator known as myeloid-related protein (MRP)-8/14 (21). This heterodimeric molecule serves as a biomarker for adverse cardiovascular events in both apparently well populations, and survivors of acute coronary syndromes (22). Current investigations are expanding our knowledge of the inflammatory actions of MRP-8/14. For example MRP-8/14 can bind TLR4, activating innate immunity through this pattern-recognition receptor (23) (Fig. 2). This ligand can also promote endothelial cell apoptosis, a process implicated in plaque thrombosis (24). These recent observations tighten the link between inflammation and thrombosis, suggesting an intimate interlacing of these 2 convergent pathways in atherosclerosis.
Adaptive immunity in atherosclerosis
Accumulating evidence supports a key regulatory role for adaptive immunity in atherosclerosis and its complications. The subject of several recent reviews, this section will highlight recent advances in this area ([3], [25] and [26]). Interacting with a special subset of mononuclear phagocytes specialized in antigen presentation known as dendritic cells (Fig. 1), T lymphocytes encounter antigens and mount a cellular immune response (Fig. 3). The dendritic cells populate atherosclerotic plaques and regional draining lymph nodes where they can present antigens to T cells with costimulatory molecules that incite this key afferent limb of adaptive immunity. Putative antigens that stimulate T cells in the context of atherosclerosis include certain heat shock proteins, components of plasma lipoproteins, and potentially, microbial structures as well. The clone of T cells that recognizes antigen in this context will proliferate to amplify the immune response. Upon renewed exposure to the specific antigen, these T cells produce cytokines and trigger inflammation, and some T cells have mechanisms specialized for killing cells (Fig. 3). This amplification accounts for the delay in the typical adaptive immune response that is slower and much more structurally specific than the “fast and blunt” innate immune response described above.
Various functionally distinct classes of T cells exist. Helper T cells spearhead antigen recognition, and fall into 2 major functional subtypes known as Th1 and Th2 (Fig. 3, left). Th1 responses generally amplify proinflammatory pathways by secretion of cytokines such as interferon-gamma. The Th1 response appears to aggravate atherosclerosis. A more recently recognized T cell subset, Th17 cells, may also exert particularly proinflammatory actions. Th2 cells elaborate cytokines that may modulate inflammation such as interleukin-4 that can promote humoral immunity (see the following text), whereas the role of Th2 in atherosclerosis is controversial ([27], [28], [29] and [30]). Some, but not all, evidence suggests that Th2-slanted responses may drive aneurysm formation ([31], [32] and [33]). Humans may have less accentuated polarization of Th1 versus Th2 cells than inbred mice.
Another T cell subtype, known as regulatory T cells, or Treg for short, appears to play an intriguing modulatory role in atherosclerosis. Treg can dampen inflammatory responses. Genetic manipulations that interfere with Treg functions, mediated by transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, augment atherogenesis in mice, yield lesions with signs of heightened inflammation, and even trigger thrombosis ([34] and [35]). Thus, Treg cells and Th2 versus Th1 and Th17 cells can counterbalance the proatherogenic effects of Th1 cells illustrating the yin and yang complexity of cellular immunity.
The types of T cells just described express the surface marker CD4 and recognize antigen presented by dendritic cells and macrophages. One-third of all T cells in human lesions are of a different type that carries the CD8 marker and recognizes antigens bound to HLA molecules on many different cell types, typically viral antigens on infected cells (Fig. 3). When activated, CD8 T cells kill neighbor cells via cell–cell contact. Several mediators produced in lesions can recruit CD8 T cells capable of killing smooth muscle cells and macrophages, processes linked to lesion growth and complication (36).
CD4 and CD8 T cells share the capacity to recognize protein antigens bound to HLA molecules on cell surfaces. The NKT cell, in contrast, reacts toward lipid antigens presented by CD1 molecules on antigen-presenting cells. Once activated, the NKT cell produces proinflammatory cytokines that promote atherosclerosis (37).
Humoral immunity in atherosclerosis
B lymphocytes secrete antibodies that like T cells, can recognize many millions if not billions of diverse structures. Convergent lines of experimental evidence suggest that humoral immunity can attenuate rather than promote atherogenesis. For example, splenectomy, ablating an important B cell compartment, aggravates atherosclerosis (38). Hypercholesterolemic mice develop a strong humoral response directed against epitopes characteristic of oxidatively modified low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ([39] and [40]). Immunization of rabbits or mice with oxidized LDL attenuates atherosclerosis. Interestingly, the antibodies elicited in mice in response to oxidized LDL also recognize a pneumococcal antigen (41). This finding underscores the view that host defenses against infectious agents can overlap with inflammatory pathways involved in atherogenesis. The observation that humoral immunity against oxidized LDL might protect against atherosclerosis has inspired therapeutic explorations of vaccination against oxidized LDL to mitigate this disease.
Clinical Translation of Inflammation Biology: The Role of Biomarkers
Following on the ferment in the basic science laboratory regarding inflammation in atherosclerosis, we have now entered an era of translation of inflammation biology to the clinic. The description of inflammatory pathways above identified several new potential therapeutic avenues. Many existing systemic anti-inflammatory strategies such as glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or anticytokine agents exert unwanted actions that render them less than ideal candidates for evaluation as long-term therapeutics for modulation of atherosclerosis. Of many promising more specific anti-inflammatory agents in development for atherosclerosis, none appear sufficiently validated for clinical use at present. In contrast, the use of inflammatory biomarkers to predict risk, monitor treatments, and guide therapy has shown substantial potential for clinical applicability.
Biomarkers of inflammation in risk prediction
The contemporary literature now contains numerous reports of the relationship between various biomarkers of inflammation and prospective cardiovascular risk, in apparently well individuals as well as in patients with coronary heart disease or heart failure. The clinical utility of a biomarker for risk prediction depends on practicability, ease, cost, and reproducibility of the measurement, and the ability to add to the predictability of existing biomarkers such as those incorporated in the Framingham algorithm. Many reviews have highlighted this fast-moving field (42). Among the many biomarkers of inflammation proposed for diagnostic use, myeloperoxidase, Lp-PLA2, pentraxin-3, cytokines such as IL-6, proteases such as matrix metalloproteinase-9, and C-reactive protein (CRP) measured by a highly sensitive assay (hsCRP) have generated considerable attention. For a variety of reasons, CRP has emerged as a leading biomarker of inflammation for clinical application. In well individuals without acute infections or inflammatory diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis), levels of hsCRP remain stable over long periods of time with a year-to-year and decade-to-decade variability comparable to that of cholesterol ([43] and [44]). CRP has considerable chemical stability, requires no special precautions for sampling, and has a relatively long half-life without the diurnal variation that plagues certain other biomarkers.
More than a dozen large-scale prospective cohort studies indicate that hsCRP predicts incident myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death even after full adjustment for the traditional Framingham covariates (45). Unbiased computational approaches have identified hsCRP as a marker that, along with parental history, sharpens the predictive ability of the traditional Framingham algorithm in women and in men ([46] and [47]). As demonstrated by the Reynolds Risk Scores, consideration of hsCRP along with parental history can correctly reclassify many individuals categorized as having intermediate risk according to the traditional Framingham criteria, a risk stratum that accounts for the majority of cardiovascular events. hsCRP may thus serve as a useful adjunct to the Framingham index as a tool to identify individuals at heightened risk for cardiovascular events.
hsCRP as a potential therapeutic goal
Practitioners routinely follow certain biomarkers as a way of monitoring the dosing of cardiovascular therapeutics. We measure low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) serially when prescribing lipid-lowering agents, blood pressure in antihypertensive therapy, and heart rate when titrating beta-adrenergic blocking agents. Given the body of evidence implicating inflammation in atherosclerosis, could an inflammatory biomarker such as hsCRP be used to monitor therapy in a way that would improve clinical effectiveness? A pre-specified analysis of the PROVE IT–TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22) study, previously discussed in these pages, suggested dual mechanisms of benefit of statin therapy, LDL-lowering, and a direct anti-inflammatory effect independent of LDL-lowering, reflected by reduction of hsCRP ([48] and [49]). Specifically, within the PROVE IT–TIMI 22 trial, clinical outcomes were best among statin-treated participants who not only achieved LDL-C levels below 70 mg/dl, but who also achieved hsCRP levels below 2 mg/l (50). A post-hoc analysis of the A to Z (Aggrastat-to-Zocor) trial affirmed this “dual target” concept in survivors of acute coronary syndromes by showing greater benefit following statin initiation among those who achieved lower levels of both LDL-C and hsCRP (51). Although these 2 datasets support the concept of monitoring hsCRP to gauge the intensity of statin therapy, existing guidelines do not currently recommend this practice.
Targeting therapy using hsCRP
Can the application of biomarkers of inflammation identify individuals that do not meet established treatment criteria who might nonetheless benefit from therapeutic intervention? A post hoc analysis of the AFCAPS/TexCAPS (Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study) proved hypothesis-generating in this regard (52). Stratification of this population of individuals with no established cardiovascular disease into 4 cells defined by above- and below-median LDL-C, and above- and below-median hsCRP showed that both groups with high LDL-C benefited from therapy as indicated by a number needed to treat (NNT) below 60. Individuals with LDL-C and hsCRP below median did not benefit from therapy, yielding a NNT of approximately 1,000 to prevent 1 cardiovascular event. The provocative cell in this analysis, the 25% of the individuals in this cohort with below-median LDL-C, but above-median hsCRP, indicated clinical benefit indistinguishable from the 2 high LDL groups. This observation suggested that well individuals with average levels of LDL-C, currently below treatment thresholds, might nonetheless benefit from statin therapy if they had concomitant elevations of hsCRP.
The recently reported JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) trial tested this hypothesis prospectively (53). The JUPITER trial enrolled 17,802 individuals without manifest cardiovascular disease, with LDL-C levels below 130 mg/dl, but with hsCRP levels ≥2 mg/l; all study participants were randomly allocated to rosuvastatin 20 mg daily or to placebo and were then followed for incident vascular events. On the advice of its independent data monitoring board, the JUPITER trial was stopped early due to a 44% reduction in the trial primary end point of all vascular events (p < 0.00001), a 54% reduction in myocardial infarction (p = 0.0002), a 48% reduction in stroke (p = 0.002), a 46% reduction in the need for arterial revascularization (p < 0.0001), and a 20% reduction in all-cause mortality (Fig. 4). All pre-specified subgroups within the trial significantly benefitted from rosuvastatin, including those groups traditionally considered to be at low risk such as those with Framingham Risk Scores <10%, those without metabolic syndrome, women, and those with elevated levels of hsCRP but no other major Adult Treatment Panel-III risk factor (Fig. 5).
High-quality image (598K)
Figure 4.
Cumulative Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in the JUPITER Trial, According to the JUPITER Study Group
A shows the cumulative incidence of the primary end point (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or confirmed death from a cardiovascular cause). B shows the cumulative incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or confirmed death from a cardiovascular cause. C shows cumulative incidence for arterial revascularization or hospitalization for unstable angina. D shows the cumulative incidence of death from any cause.
Adapted, with permission, from Ridker et al. (53).
View Within Article
High-quality image (354K)
Figure 5.
Effects of Rosuvastatin on the Primary Trial End Point, According to Baseline Characteristics of the JUPITER Cohort
Adapted, with permission, from Ridker et al. (53). ATP = Adult Treatment Panel; BMI = body mass index; CHD = coronary heart disease; HX = history.
View Within Article
The treated group in JUPITER enjoyed substantive reductions in both absolute and relative risk. Despite excluding all individuals with hyperlipidemia (LDL >130 mg/dl, the actual median LDL at entry was 108 mg/dl), the placebo event rate in JUPITER exceeded that of AFCAPS/TexCAPS, indicating that those with a heightened inflammatory burden disclosed by elevated hsCRP have high vascular risk even when cholesterol levels lie within a range considered acceptable by current guidelines. With regard to cost-effectiveness, the commonly accepted metric of NNT at 5 years is 25 in JUPITER for the primary study end point and 32 for the “hard end point” of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death (54). These NNT values compare favorably to the 5-yr NNT values of 50 that have been reported in prior primary prevention trials of statin therapy in the setting of overt hyperlipidemia. They also compare very favorably to the treatment of hypertension (5-yr NNT: 80 to 160) or to aspirin prophylaxis (5-yr NNT: 250 to 300). Pre-specified analyses within the JUPITER database affirm that maximum treatment benefit occurs with reduction of both LDL-C and hsCRP (Fig. 6) (55). This finding has clinical relevance since, in JUPITER, the median on-treatment LDL-C was only 55 mg/dl (and 25% of the trial participants had LDL-C <45 mg/dl), yet optimum benefits accrue not only when LDL-C levels reached these very low targets, but also when hsCRP levels fell greatly.
High-quality image (154K)
Figure 6.
Hazard Ratios for Incident Cardiovascular Events in the JUPITER Trial According to Achieved Concentrations of LDL Cholesterol and hsCRP After Initiation of Rosuvastatin Therapy
Data were adjusted for age, baseline low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), blood pressure, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and parental history of premature coronary heart disease. Event rates are per 100 person-years. p < 0.001.
Adapted, with permission, from Ridker et al. (55).
View Within Article
The Future of Inflammation in Atherosclerosis
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: beyond statins
As described above, a growing body of evidence supports the use of statins as an anti-inflammatory intervention in atherosclerosis due to both LDL-lowering and direct anti-inflammatory actions. Progress in understanding the basic biology of inflammation in atherosclerosis has identified potential novel strategies for modulating inflammation in atherosclerosis. No large-scale clinical trial has yet established that an anti-inflammatory intervention that does not alter lipid levels can improve cardiovascular outcomes. Although certain established systemic anti-inflammatory therapies such as corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents do not appear promising as antiatherosclerotic interventions, other agents warrant consideration in this regard. Clinical trials currently underway are exploring the potential of inhibiting lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 as an anti-inflammatory therapy, although the first hypothesis-testing trial for this agent failed to meet either of its pre-specified primary end points (56). Various protein therapeutic strategies such as anti-integrin or anticytokine therapies have received consideration for therapeutic application. Therapeutic vaccination with lipoprotein peptides is also being considered for clinical evaluation (57). All of these potential direct anti-inflammatory modalities will require extensive clinical evaluation and direct testing in randomized trials before adoption and practice.
Imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis
Traditional cardiovascular imaging has focused on anatomy. Magnetic resonance and nuclear imaging techniques can approach aspects of cardiac function such as perfusion and viability. The identification of molecular mediators of inflammation that operate during atherogenesis has generated considerable interest in harnessing them as targets for imaging. Examples of tempting targets in this regard include adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, monocyte/macrophage functions such as phagocytosis tracked with microparticulate markers, glucose uptake as monitored by fluorodeoxyglucose, microvessels identified by integrin-directed agents, modified LDL accumulating in lesions, and proteinases implicated in vascular remodeling and plaque destabilization ([58], [59], [60] and [61]). A growing experimental literature has demonstrated the feasibility of many of these targeted imaging strategies. Few, if any, of these modalities appear near ready for clinical application, however. Even those currently available, such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging, will require considerable clinical validation before adoption in clinical practice ([62] and [63]).
Genetics of inflammation in atherosclerosis
Progress in genetics and genomics, and enormous technical strides in genotyping have heightened interest in defining genetic biomarkers of cardiovascular risk that may open new perspectives in personalized medicine in the future. The computational analysis of various biomarkers alluded to previously identified family history of cardiovascular disease in a parent at age ≤60 years along with hsCRP added to the traditional Framingham variables in predicting cardiovascular risk ([46] and [47]). This observation suggests the importance of genetic factors as contributors to cardiovascular risk prediction not completely captured by the Framingham algorithm.
An initial wave of enthusiasm stimulated multiple studies of individual single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or, in a more sophisticated approach, haplotypes (64). The advent of genome-wide association screens (GWAS) has proven quite fruitful ([65] and [66]). The concordant identification of a region on Chromosome 9 as associated with cardiovascular disease in several large, independent genetic studies has reinforced future potential of genetics in identifying risk predictors and potential therapeutic targets (65). Identification by GWAS of “sentinel” members of pathways known to participate in atherosclerosis enhances confidence in the validity of this approach, yet many questions remain unanswered (67). The functional genomic work required to unravel the biological pathways revealed by GWAS will require considerable investigative effort in years to come. The pursuit of genetic factors identified by GWAS should identify participants in inflammatory pathways that will broaden our understanding and mastery of inflammation in atherosclerosis.
Conclusions
Since our last reviews on these topics, evidence for the involvement of the immune and inflammatory responses in atherogenesis has only intensified. This review has focused on recent advances in this area. We stand on the threshold of an era when clinical inflammation of inflammation biology will prove clinically useful and transformative of clinical practice. This example of translational medicine indicates how clinical challenges have inspired laboratory research that revolutionized our concepts of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis over the last 2 decades. The rapid clinical application of these advances in basic science to clinical cardiovascular medicine promises to provide important new tools for diagnosis, monitoring, and management of patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease in the near future.
References
1 R. Ross and J.A. Glomset, The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis I, N Engl J Med 295 (1976), pp. 369–377. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (392)
2 P. Libby and G.K. Hansson, Involvement of the immune system in human atherogenesis: current knowledge and unanswered questions, Lab Invest 64 (1991), pp. 5–15. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (402)
3 G.K. Hansson and P. Libby, The immune response in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword, Nat Rev Immunol 6 (2006), pp. 508–519. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (510)
4 G.K. Hansson, P. Libby, U. Schonbeck and Z.Q. Yan, Innate and adaptive immunity in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, Circ Res 91 (2002), pp. 281–291. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (468)
5 M.L. Karnovsky, Metchnikoff in Messina: a century of studies on phagocytosis, N Engl J Med 304 (1981), pp. 1178–1180. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (7)
6 I.F. Charo and R.M. Ransohoff, The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation, N Engl J Med 354 (2006), pp. 610–621. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (652)
7 A. Viola and A.D. Luster, Chemokines and their receptors: drug targets in immunity and inflammation, Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 48 (2008), pp. 171–197. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (120)
8 F.K. Swirski, M.J. Pittet and M.F. Kircher et al., Monocyte accumulation in mouse atherogenesis is progressive and proportional to extent of disease, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (2006), pp. 10340–10345. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (65)
9 P. Libby, M. Nahrendorf, M.J. Pittet and F.K. Swirski, Diversity of denizens of the atherosclerotic plaque: not all monocytes are created equal, Circulation 117 (2008), pp. 3168–3170. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (20)
10 F.K. Swirski, P. Libby and E. Aikawa et al., Ly-6Chi monocytes dominate hypercholesterolemia-associated monocytosis and give rise to macrophages in atheromata, J Clin Invest 117 (2007), pp. 195–205. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (180)
11 F. Tacke, D. Alvarez and T.J. Kaplan et al., Monocyte subsets differentially employ CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1 to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques, J Clin Invest 117 (2007), pp. 185–194. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (229)
12 F. Geissmann, S. Jung and D.R. Littman, Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties, Immunity 19 (2003), pp. 71–82. Article |
13 G. An, H. Wang and R. Tang et al., P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 is highly expressed on Ly-6Chi monocytes and a major determinant for Ly-6Chi monocyte recruitment to sites of atherosclerosis in mice, Circulation 117 (2008), pp. 3227–3237. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (37)
14 P.T. Kovanen, Mast cells: multipotent local effector cells in atherothrombosis, Immunol Rev 217 (2007), pp. 105–122. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (32)
15 P. Libby and G.P. Shi, Mast cells as mediators and modulators of atherogenesis, Circulation 115 (2007), pp. 2471–2473. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)
16 J. Sun, G.K. Sukhova and P.J. Wolters et al., Mast cells promote atherosclerosis by releasing proinflammatory cytokines, Nat Med 13 (2007), pp. 719–724. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (96)
17 I. Bot, S.C. de Jager and A. Zernecke et al., Perivascular mast cells promote atherogenesis and induce plaque destabilization in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice, Circulation 115 (2007), pp. 2516–2525. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (63)
18 P.W. Serruys, H.M. Garcia-Garcia and P. Buszman et al., Effects of the direct lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) inhibitor darapladib on human coronary atherosclerotic plaque, Circulation 118 (2008), pp. 1172–1182. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (133)
19 A. Kawakami, M. Osaka and M. Aikawa et al., Toll-like 2 receptor mediates apolipoprotein CIII-induced monocyte activation, Circ Res 103 (2008), pp. 1402–1409. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (22)
20 K. Croce and P. Libby, Intertwining of thrombosis and inflammation in atherosclerosis, Curr Opin Hematol 14 (2007), pp. 55–61. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (74)
21 A.M. Healy, M.D. Pickard and A.D. Pradhan et al., Platelet expression profiling and clinical validation of myeloid-related protein-14 as a novel determinant of cardiovascular events, Circulation 113 (2006), pp. 2278–2284. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (63)
22 D.A. Morrow, Y. Wang and K. Croce et al., Myeloid-related protein 8/14 and the risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction after an acute coronary syndrome in the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) trial, Am Heart J 155 (2008), pp. 49–55. Article |
23 T. Vogl, K. Tenbrock and S. Ludwig et al., Mrp8 and Mrp14 are endogenous activators of Toll-like receptor 4, promoting lethal, endotoxin-induced shock, Nat Med 13 (2007), pp. 1042–1049. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (154)
24 D. Viemann, K. Barczyk and T. Vogl et al., MRP8/MRP14 impairs endothelial integrity and induces a caspase-dependent and -independent cell death program, Blood 109 (2007), pp. 2453–2460. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (29)
25 Z. Mallat, S. Taleb, H. Ait-Oufella and A. Tedgui, The role of adaptive T cell immunity in atherosclerosis, J Lipid Res 50 (Suppl) (2009), pp. S364–S369.
26 C.M. Weyand, B.R. Younge and J.J. Goronzy, T cells in arteritis and atherosclerosis, Curr Opin Lipidol 19 (2008), pp. 469–477. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (10)
27 P. Davenport and P.G. Tipping, The role of interleukin-4 and interleukin-12 in the progression of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice, Am J Pathol 163 (2003), pp. 1117–1125. Abstract | Article |
28 C.J. Binder, K. Hartvigsen and M.K. Chang et al., IL-5 links adaptive and natural immunity specific for epitopes of oxidized LDL and protects from atherosclerosis, J Clin Invest 114 (2004), pp. 427–437. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (125)
29 G.N. Fredrikson, L. Andersson and I. Soderberg et al., Atheroprotective immunization with MDA-modified apo B-100 peptide sequences is associated with activation of the Th2 specific antibody expression, Autoimmunity 38 (2005), pp. 171–179. Full Text via CrossRef
30 E.J. van Wanrooij, G.H. van Puijvelde, P. de Vos, H. Yagita, T.J. van Berkel and J. Kuiper, Interruption of the Tnfrsf4/Tnfsf4 (OX40/OX40L) pathway attenuates atherogenesis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27 (2007), pp. 204–210. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (37)
31 U. Schonbeck, G.K. Sukhova, N. Gerdes and P. Libby, T(H)2 predominant immune responses prevail in human abdominal aortic aneurysm, Am J Pathol 161 (2002), pp. 499–506. Abstract | Article |
32 K. Shimizu, M. Shichiri, P. Libby, R.T. Lee and R.N. Mitchell, Th2-predominant inflammation and blockade of IFN-gamma signaling induce aneurysms in allografted aortas, J Clin Invest 114 (2004), pp. 300–308. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (67)
33 P.C. Tang, A.O. Yakimov and M.A. Teesdale et al., Transmural inflammation by interferon-gamma-producing T cells correlates with outward vascular remodeling and intimal expansion of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms, FASEB J 19 (2005), pp. 1528–1530. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (21)
34 A.K. Robertson, M. Rudling, X. Zhou, L. Gorelik, R.A. Flavell and G.K. Hansson, Disruption of TGF-beta signaling in T cells accelerates atherosclerosis, J Clin Invest 112 (2003), pp. 1342–1350. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (176)
35 H. Ait-Oufella, B.L. Salomon and S. Potteaux et al., Natural regulatory T cells control the development of atherosclerosis in mice, Nat Med 12 (2006), pp. 178–180. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (185)
36 B. Ludewig, S. Freigang and M. Jaggi et al., Linking immune-mediated arterial inflammation and cholesterol-induced atherosclerosis in a transgenic mouse model, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97 (2000), pp. 12752–12757. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (65)
37 E. Tupin, A. Nicoletti, R. Elhage, M. Rudling, H.-G. Ljunggren and G.K. Hansson, CD1d-dependent activation of NKT cells aggravates atherosclerosis, J Experi Med 199 (2004), pp. 417–422. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (137)
38 G. Caligiuri, A. Nicoletti, B. Poirier and G.K. Hansson, Protective immunity against atherosclerosis carried by B cells of hypercholesterolemic mice, J Clin Invest 109 (2002), pp. 745–753. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (181)
39 K. Hartvigsen, M.Y. Chou and L.F. Hansen et al., The role of innate immunity in atherogenesis, J Lipid Res 50 (Suppl) (2009), pp. S388–S393.
40 M.Y. Chou, K. Hartvigsen and L.F. Hansen et al., Oxidation-specific epitopes are important targets of innate immunity, J Intern Med 263 (2008), pp. 479–488. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (28)
41 C.J. Binder, P.X. Shaw and M.K. Chang et al., The role of natural antibodies in atherogenesis, J Lipid Res 46 (2005), pp. 1353–1363. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (97)
42 R.S. Vasan, Biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: molecular basis and practical considerations, Circulation 113 (2006), pp. 2335–2362. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (220)
43 J. Danesh, J.G. Wheeler and G.M. Hirschfield et al., C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease, N Engl J Med 350 (2004), pp. 1387–1397. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (1255)
44 R.J. Glynn, J.G. MacFadyen and P.M. Ridker, Tracking of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after an initially elevated concentration: the JUPITER study, Clin Chem 55 (2009), pp. 305–312. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (16)
45 P.M. Ridker, C-reactive protein and the prediction of cardiovascular events among those at intermediate risk: moving an inflammatory hypothesis toward consensus, J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007), pp. 2129–2138. Article |
46 P.M. Ridker, J.E. Buring, N. Rifai and N.R. Cook, Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds Risk Score, JAMA 297 (2007), pp. 611–619. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (339)
47 P.M. Ridker, N.P. Paynter, N. Rifai, J.M. Gaziano and N.R. Cook, C-reactive protein and parental history improve global cardiovascular risk prediction: the Reynolds Risk Score for men, Circulation 118 (2008), pp. 2243–2251. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (138)
48 P.M. Ridker, C.P. Cannon and D. Morrow et al., C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy, N Engl J Med 352 (2005), pp. 20–28. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (1097)
49 P. Libby and P.M. Ridker, Inflammation and atherothrombosis: from population biology and bench research to clinical practice, J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006), pp. A33–A46. Article |
50 P.M. Ridker, D.A. Morrow, L.M. Rose, N. Rifai, C.P. Cannon and E. Braunwald, Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial, J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (2005), pp. 1644–1648. Article |
51 D.A. Morrow, J.A. de Lemos and M.S. Sabatine et al., Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein during follow-up of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Aggrastat-to-Zocor Trial, Circulation 114 (2006), pp. 281–288. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (98)
52 P.M. Ridker, N. Rifai and M. Clearfield et al., Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events, N Engl J Med 344 (2001), pp. 1959–1965. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (1014)
53 P.M. Ridker, E. Danielson, F.A.H. Fonseca et al. and JUPITER Study Group, Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein, N Engl J Med 359 (2008), pp. 2195–2207. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (1181)
54 P.M. Ridker, J.G. MacFadyen and F.A.H. Fonseca et al., Number needed to treat with rosuvastatin to prevent first cardiovascular events and death among men and women with low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2009 Sept 22) [E-pub ahead of print].
55 P.M. Ridker, E. Danielson and F.A.H. Fonseca et al., Reduction in C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the JUPITER trial, Lancet 373 (2009), pp. 1175–1182. Article |
56 S.M. Boekholdt, R.J. de Winter and J.J. Kastelein, Inhibition of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase activity by darapladib: shifting gears in cardiovascular drug development: are antiinflammatory drugs the next frontier?, Circulation 118 (2008), pp. 1120–1122. Full Text via CrossRef
57 G.K. Hansson and J. Nilsson, Introduction: atherosclerosis as inflammation: a controversial concept becomes accepted, J Int Med 263 (2008), pp. 462–463. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (8)
58 S. Kaul and J.R. Lindner, Visualizing coronary atherosclerosis in vivo: thinking big, imaging small, J Am Coll Cardiol 43 (2004), pp. 461–463. Article |
59 S.A. Wickline, A.M. Neubauer, P. Winter, S. Caruthers and G. Lanza, Applications of nanotechnology to atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26 (2006), pp. 435–441. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (47)
60 F.A. Jaffer, C. Vinegoni and M.C. John et al., Real-time catheter molecular sensing of inflammation in proteolytically active atherosclerosis, Circulation 118 (2008), pp. 1802–1809. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (32)
61 B.A. Kaufmann, J.M. Sanders and C. Davis et al., Molecular imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis with targeted ultrasound detection of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, Circulation 116 (2007), pp. 276–284. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (87)
62 N. Tahara, H. Kai and H. Nakaura et al., The prevalence of inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis: analysis with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, Eur Heart J 28 (2007), pp. 2243–2248. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (30)
63 J.H. Rudd, K.S. Myers and S. Bansilal et al., Atherosclerosis inflammation imaging with 18F-FDG PET: carotid, iliac, and femoral uptake reproducibility, quantification methods, and recommendations, J Nucl Med 49 (2008), pp. 871–878. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (77)
64 D.T. Miller, P.M. Ridker, P. Libby and D.J. Kwiatkowski, Atherosclerosis: the path from genomics to therapeutics, J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007), pp. 1589–1599. Article |
65 H. Schunkert, A. Gotz and P. Braund et al., Repeated replication and a prospective meta-analysis of the association between chromosome 9p21.3 and coronary artery disease, Circulation 117 (2008), pp. 1675–1684. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (118)
66 P.M. Ridker, D.I. Chasman and R.Y. Zee et al., Rationale, design, and methodology of the Women's Genome Health Study: a genome-wide association study of more than 25,000 initially healthy American women, Clin Chem 54 (2008), pp. 249–255. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (44)
67 P.M. Ridker, G. Pare and A. Parker et al., Loci related to metabolic-syndrome pathways including LEPR, HNF1A, IL6R, and GCKR associate with plasma C-reactive protein: the Women's Genome Health Study, Am J Hum Genet 82 (2008), pp. 1185–1192. Article |
This work was supported by grants from the Fondation Leducq (to Drs. Libby, Ridker, and Hansson), the Swedish Research Council (to Dr. Hansson), the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (to Dr. Hansson), and the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation (to Drs. Libby and Ridker). Dr. Libby is an unpaid consultant to AstraZeneca. Dr. Ridker has received research funding support from multiple not-for-profit entities including the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Cancer Institute, the American Heart Association, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the Leducq Foundation, the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation, and the James and Polly Annenberg La Vea Charitable Trusts; he has also received investigator-initiated research support from multiple for-profit entities including AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pharmacia, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Abbott, as well as nonfinancial research support from Amgen. In addition, he is listed as a coinventor on patents held by the Brigham and Women's Hospital that relate to the use of inflammatory biomarkers in cardiovascular disease that have been licensed to Siemens and AstraZeneca, and has served as a research consultant to Schering-Plough, Sanofi-Aventis, AstraZeneca, Isis, Dade, Merck, Novartis, and Vascular Biogenics.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume 54, Issue 23, 1 December 2009, Pages 2129-2138
- About ScienceDirect
-
- What is ScienceDirect
- Content details
- Set up
- How to use
- Subscriptions
- Developers
- Contact and Support
-
- Contact and Support
- About Elsevier
-
- About Elsevier
- About SciVerse
- About SciVal
- Terms and Conditions
- Privacy policy
- Information for advertisers