魔法门之英雄无敌2:从审稿人意见看中国学者英语论文中出现的问题
来源:百度文库 编辑:九乡新闻网 时间:2024/07/07 10:46:27
以下12点内容是老师和我从收集的审稿人意见中总结出来的,希望能对大家的写作有所帮助,也希望大家能给与支持。其中的错误,请各位大牛不吝赐教。
以下12点是随机排序,无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意
见构成。
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me
thods used in the study.
◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨:
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:
A hypothesis needs to be presented
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念:
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?
7、对研究问题的定义:
Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.
9、对claim,如A>B的证明,verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.
10、严谨度问题:
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.
11、格式(重视程度):
◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):
有关语言的审稿人意见:
◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete sentences.
◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are pro
blems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction.
◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We str
ongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed i
n English or whose native language is English.
◆ Please have someone competent in the English language and the subject matte
r of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?
◆ the quality of English needs improving.
Encouragement from reviewers:
◆ I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has be
en edited because the subject is interesting.
◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled "……" which you subm
itted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B - Applied Biomat
erials.
◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.
以下12点是随机排序,无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意
见构成。
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me
thods used in the study.
◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨:
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:
A hypothesis needs to be presented
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念:
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?
7、对研究问题的定义:
Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.
9、对claim,如A>B的证明,verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.
10、严谨度问题:
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.
11、格式(重视程度):
◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):
有关语言的审稿人意见:
◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete sentences.
◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are pro
blems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction.
◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We str
ongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed i
n English or whose native language is English.
◆ Please have someone competent in the English language and the subject matte
r of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?
◆ the quality of English needs improving.
Encouragement from reviewers:
◆ I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has be
en edited because the subject is interesting.
◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled "……" which you subm
itted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B - Applied Biomat
erials.
◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.
从审稿人意见看中国学者英语论文中出现的问题
《从南海问题上看中国的面子问题》
《从南海问题上看中国的面子问题》
从童话故事看学位论文中存在的问题 - 焦建利
美国研究中国问题最资深的学者傅高义 如何看中国?
中国不会出现大的稳定问题
学者认为中国已出现“刘易斯拐点”
从案件审理视角看当前案件调查中需要注意的问题
WORD中经常出现的小问题的解决方法
美国学者:中国的计划生育出了问题
《外交学者》把中国的问题送出国
高效课堂教学模式实施中可能出现的问题
民事案件公告送达中出现的问题及对策
(转)WORD中出现链接HYPERLINK的问题
在岗位标准讨论过程中出现的问题
公司采购管理中出现的问题以及处理方法
从衣食住行看中国的分配问题 -言论-东方早报网
从内脏看问题
{刘言刘语}从李娜夺冠看中国体质问题
{刘言刘语}从李娜夺冠看中国体质问题
关于印发《关于发放购房补贴中几个具体问题的处理意见》的通知
上海高院《关于审理民事纠纷案件中涉及刑事犯罪若干程序问题的处理意见
中国学者:对立已成结构性问题
中石化岳阳出现问题油